









 

                                       
                                        


<!-- SECTIONS OF REPORT -->

<div id="-body-1" class="body">
    <p>Our intention is to work  according to all external regulations and laws to prevent fines, penalties and  violations (monetary and non-monetary).</p>
<p>We are reporting all of our  fines, penalties and violations (monetary and non-monetary) in excess of  CAN$10,000 and US$10,000 (depending on the country in which they occurred).</p>
<p>In 2017, we remitted the  following fines, penalties and violations:</p>


<div class="table width--full data--left data--borders header--yellow">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
    <td>Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) U.S.</td>
    <td>In April 2017, Enbridge paid a Civil Penalty of $33,100 concerning a Notice of Probable Violation/Compliance Order resulting from a    2015 records audit where welding issues were identified by PHMSA inspectors. The audit was associated with the BP Amoco Pipe Modification Project performed at the Cushing Terminal.<br/><br/>
Enbridge also paid a Civil Penalty of $65,500 in January 2018.  The penalty resulted from a PHMSA inspection from 2015 on the Algonquin Gas Transmission LLC and Hubline Pipelines. The penalty is based on two violations of PHMSA regulations related to external corrosion control monitoring and atmospheric corrosion control monitoring.</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Texas    Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) U.S.</td>
    <td>Enbridge paid a penalty of $25,411 to the TCEQ in March    2017. The payment was a component of an Agreed Order resulting from a    timeline challenge to the renewal of an Air Quality Standard Permit, and    other operations representations and conduct in connection with the same permit. </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan Southern Division</td>
    <td>In 2016, we reached a settlement agreement, called a &ldquo;Consent Decree,&rdquo; which was    filed with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan    Southern Division. The Consent Decree was our signed settlement agreement    with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of    Justice regarding our 2010 Line 6B crude oil spill on the Kalamazoo River    near Marshall, Michigan, and our Line 6A crude oil spill in Romeoville,    Illinois. It stipulated that Enbridge would pay US$62 million in civil    penalties, which includes US$61 million in respect of Line 6B and US$1    million in respect of Line 6A. The Consent Decree also required us to comply    with a series of other measures for remediation and enhanced safety.<br>
      The    Consent Decree was subject to court approval, which was obtained in May 2017.    Now that the Decree has taken effect, Enbridge has paid the US$62 million    fine, plus another US$5.4 million in reimbursements for environmental    remediation measures.*</td>
  </tr>
</table>
</div>


<p>* In addition, the Consent  Decree identified a number of enhanced safety measure that we must complete  within a four-year period. These measures are, for the most part, consistent  with the changes we have made to our overall approach to safety and integrity  since our Marshall spill, and have largely been implemented over the past six  years as part of the system-wide improvements we have made to our practices.  Our compliance with the safety improvement measures specified in the Consent  Decree is subject to independent verification.</p>

</div>





















<!-- / columns -->